Accessibility Evaluation

Report:
Sub-study content digital accessibility website Werken bij de gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel


Evaluator
Michiel, Swink
Date
4 May 2023
Commissioner
Gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel

Summary of the evaluation findings

The website Contentaudit Werken bij de gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel English version does not comply to WCAG 2.1 level AA yet. 7 out of 50 success criteria contain one or more issues. This document describes to what extent the website meets the accessibility requirements captured in WCAG, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.

The website werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl was investigated on May 4, 2023. The investigation was carried out using the evaluation method WCAG-EM. The content does not yet meet all the success criteria examined. This report forms the basis for further work on accessibility. Only the content was checked for this sub-study. This report and the system investigation/platform investigation report 'Rapportage Toegankelijkheidsaudit WCAG 2.1 AA https://www.werken-bij-audit.jobsrepublic.eu/JobsRepublic' jointly determine the extent to which the website complies. The 2 reports can also be used together in the accessibility statement.

The content of the website is almost entirely accessible. There are a few more points to note:

The audit focuses specifically on the accessibility of the website for people with a disability, such as people who are blind, deaf, low-literate or have other functional problems. For them it is important that the website is technically and substantively designed in such a way that the site is usable. Optimizing a website for accessibility has more advantages; it makes the website more usable for everyone (for example also for people who look at their mobile phone in a sunny environment) and it makes the site easier to find in search engines.

Scope of the evaluation

Website name Contentaudit Werken bij de gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel English version
Scope of the website Within the scope of the audit:
  • All pages on werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl
Outside of the scope of the audit:
  • Subwebsite(s) where the HTML and/or the system differs from the researched website.
  • All external systems and websites to which the researched domain links.
Conformance target WCAG 2.1 level AA
Accessibility support baseline The usual browsers en helpsoftware

Overview of audit results

Principle Passed Failed Can't tell
1 Perceivable 17 3 0
2 Operable 16 1 0
3 Understandable 8 2 0
4 Robust 2 1 0
Total 43 7 0

Reading Guide

This evaluation is a snapshot. The website might have been changed. The problems found are only examples. Therefore, check for any problem whether this also occurs in other places. This evaluation is just a sample of a few pages. As many different types of pages are included in the sample as possible to get the best impression of the accessibility. Pay attention! New problems may arise when making improvements or changes to the website/app. Success criteria marked with "Not present" are automatically approved. Success criteria marked with "Unknown" or "Can't tell" are not approved.

Detailed audit results


1. Perceivable

1.1 Text Alternatives

1.1.1 Non-text Content (Level A)

All non-text content that is presented to the user has a text alternative that serves the equivalent purpose, except for the situations listed below.

Information about success criterion 1.1.1 Non-text Content

Outcome: Failed

Findings: At various places on the website, for example on the homepage or on a vacature-page you find next to the 'vacature' a number of icons, for example a Euro sign or a clock. Thes SVG-images have meaning but they lack an name.Solve this with role=image and a title describing the image. Also see 4.1.2

On page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/accessibility there is an image of text. The code that can be downloaded and embedded on accessibility-statement.nl is accessible. However, this code has not been used here, but its own alternative text has been used, so that the image is no longer accessible. Add the code provided by Logius in the accessibility statements registry to resolve this issue.


1.2 Time-based Media

1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) (Level A)

For prerecorded audio-only and prerecorded video-only media, the following are true, except when the audio or video is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such:

Information about success criterion 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

Outcome: Inapplicable


1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) (Level A)

Captions are provided for all prerecorded audio content in synchronized media, except when the media is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such.

Information about success criterion 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded)

Outcome: Passed


1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) (Level A)

An alternative for time-based media or audio description of the prerecorded video content is provided for synchronized media, except when the media is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such.

Information about success criterion 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)

Outcome: Passed


1.2.4 Captions (Live) (Level AA)

Captions are provided for all live audio content in synchronized media.

Information about success criterion 1.2.4 Captions (Live)

Outcome: Inapplicable


1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) (Level AA)

Audio description is provided for all prerecorded video content in synchronized media.

Information about success criterion 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded)

Outcome: Passed


1.3 Adaptable

1.3.1 Info and Relationships (Level A)

Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text.

Information about success criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships

Outcome: Failed

Findings: On page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/contact, the visual header 'Team recruitment' is formatted with the b-element instead of a header-element. Visitors who use reading software can navigate the page using a shortcut key or a heading list, in order to quickly get an idea of ​​the content. Texts that are only visually a heading, but are not formatted as such in the code, are not operable and accessible in this way. Make sure that texts that are visually headlines are coded as such.

On page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/39009/medewerker-s-handhaving there are several headings, such as 'Daarom werken voor Capelle aan den IJssel' and 'Heb je interesse?' formatted with the strong element. The strong element gives emphasis to a word or short sentence and should therefore not be used purely for layout. Visitors who use reading software can navigate the page using a shortcut key or a heading list, in order to quickly get an idea of ​​the content. Texts that are only visually a heading, but are not formatted as such in the code, are not operable and accessible in this way. Make sure that texts that are visually headlines are coded as such. This problem occurs on several pages, including on page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/42220/projectleider-vastgoed.

On page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/42220/projectleider-vastgoed the text 'Acquisitie naar aanleiding van deze advertentie stellen wij niet op prijs.' formatted with the em element. The em element gives spoken emphasis to a word or a few words and should therefore not be used purely for formatting. Use the i element or CSS to create similar formatting without the semantic meaning of the em element.

Advice: On page https://www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/cookie-beleid, the first heading has level 2. Usually a page starts with a level 1 heading with the title of the page. The same occurs on page https://www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/vacatures.

Advice: On page https://www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/39009/medewerker-s-handhaving there are lists where the bullets consist of a special ascii character. Some utility software pronounces that character as "right pointing pointer." That's confusing. Hide the character for reading software.


1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence (Level A)

When the sequence in which content is presented affects its meaning, a correct reading sequence can be programmatically determined.

Information about success criterion 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence

Outcome: Passed


1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics (Level A)

Instructions provided for understanding and operating content do not rely solely on sensory characteristics of components such as shape, size, visual location, orientation, or sound.

Information about success criterion 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics

Outcome: Passed


1.3.4 Orientation (Level AA)

Content does not restrict its view and operation to a single display orientation, such as portrait or landscape, unless a specific display orientation is essential.

Information about success criterion 1.3.4 Orientation

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose (Level AA)

The purpose of each input field collecting information about the user can be programmatically determined when:

Information about success criterion 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


1.4 Distinguishable

1.4.1 Use of Color (Level A)

Color is not used as the only visual means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element.

Information about success criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color

Outcome: Passed


1.4.2 Audio Control (Level A)

If any audio on a Web page plays automatically for more than 3 seconds, either a mechanism is available to pause or stop the audio, or a mechanism is available to control audio volume independently from the overall system volume level.

Information about success criterion 1.4.2 Audio Control

Outcome: Passed


1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (Level AA)

The visual presentation of text and images of text has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, except for the following:

Information about success criterion 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

Outcome: Passed


1.4.4 Resize text (Level AA)

Except for captions and images of text, text can be resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent without loss of content or functionality.

Information about success criterion 1.4.4 Resize text

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


1.4.5 Images of Text (Level AA)

If the technologies being used can achieve the visual presentation, text is used to convey information rather than images of text except for the following:

Information about success criterion 1.4.5 Images of Text

Outcome: Passed


1.4.10 Reflow (Level AA)

Content can be presented without loss of information or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in two dimensions for:

Except for parts of the content which require two-dimensional layout for usage or meaning.

Information about success criterion 1.4.10 Reflow

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


1.4.11 Non-text Contrast (Level AA)

The visual presentation of the following have a contrast ratio of at least 3:1 against adjacent color(s):

Information about success criterion 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast

Outcome: Failed

Findings: This finding may require a technical solution:
The light gray edges of the input fields (HEX #D0D0D0) on the white background on page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/open-sollicitatie or www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/stage have too low a contrast. The contrast ratio here is 1.5:1, where it should be at least 3:1.
If a field has not been filled in or has been filled in incorrectly and the form is submitted, the pink border of the field (HEX #FCA5A5) on the white background has a contrast ratio of 1.9:1 where this should be at least 3:1.

This finding may require a technical solution:
On page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/39009/medewerker-s-handhaving there is a red button (HEX #BF0029) on a blue background (HEX #013F75). When the button has keyboard focus, it is visible by a red focus border in the same shade of red as the button. The contrast ratio between the focus edge and the blue background is only 1.6:1 where it should be at least 3:1.

This finding may require a technical solution:
On pages such as www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/stage, visitors can add files to an entry. The contrast ratio between the (gray X icon) button to delete a file (HEX #C0BCBB) and the background is only 1.8:1 where it should be at least 3:1.


1.4.12 Text Spacing (Level AA)

In content implemented using markup languages that support the following text style properties, no loss of content or functionality occurs by setting all of the following and by changing no other style property:

Information about success criterion 1.4.12 Text Spacing

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus (Level AA)

Where receiving and then removing pointer hover or keyboard focus triggers additional content to become visible and then hidden, the following are true:

Information about success criterion 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2. Operable

2.1 Keyboard Accessible

2.1.1 Keyboard (Level A)

All functionality of the content is operable through a keyboard interface without requiring specific timings for individual keystrokes, except where the underlying function requires input that depends on the path of the user's movement and not just the endpoints.

Information about success criterion 2.1.1 Keyboard

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap (Level A)

If keyboard focus can be moved to a component of the page using a keyboard interface, then focus can be moved away from that component using only a keyboard interface, and, if it requires more than unmodified arrow or tab keys or other standard exit methods, the user is advised of the method for moving focus away.

Information about success criterion 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts (Level A)

If a keyboard shortcut is implemented in content using only letter (including upper- and lower-case letters), punctuation, number, or symbol characters, then at least one of the following is true:

Information about success criterion 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts

Outcome: Failed

Findings: On the homepage a video player of Vimeo is used. This player allows the use of single character key operation, for example an f for fullscreen. This functionality is something that can get in the way of people who are depend on speech software. These people depend on those short commands to operate their computers with speech software. Solve this by changing the embed code of the Vimeo video so that the operation with character keys is off. The property to be added to the embed code is 'keyboard: false'. With this adjustment you ensure that you meet this success criterion.


2.2 Enough Time

2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (Level A)

For each time limit that is set by the content, at least one of the following is true:

Information about success criterion 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide (Level A)

For moving, blinking, scrolling, or auto-updating information, all of the following are true:

Information about success criterion 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide

Outcome: Passed


2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions

2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold (Level A)

Web pages do not contain anything that flashes more than three times in any one second period, or the flash is below the general flash and red flash thresholds.

Information about success criterion 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold

Outcome: Passed


2.4.1 Bypass Blocks (Level A)

A mechanism is available to bypass blocks of content that are repeated on multiple Web pages.

Information about success criterion 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.4.2 Page Titled (Level A)

Web pages have titles that describe topic or purpose.

Information about success criterion 2.4.2 Page Titled

Outcome: Passed


2.4.3 Focus Order (Level A)

If a Web page can be navigated sequentially and the navigation sequences affect meaning or operation, focusable components receive focus in an order that preserves meaning and operability.

Information about success criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


The purpose of each link can be determined from the link text alone or from the link text together with its programmatically determined link context, except where the purpose of the link would be ambiguous to users in general.

Information about success criterion 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context)

Outcome: Passed


2.4.5 Multiple Ways (Level AA)

More than one way is available to locate a Web page within a set of Web pages except where the Web Page is the result of, or a step in, a process.

Information about success criterion 2.4.5 Multiple Ways

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.4.6 Headings and Labels (Level AA)

Headings and labels describe topic or purpose.

Information about success criterion 2.4.6 Headings and Labels

Outcome: Passed

Findings: Advies: De submit knop van het sollicitatieformulier op pagina https://www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/39009/medewerker-s-handhaving heeft het label 'Ja, ik heb interesse'. Voor sommige mensen kan dat onduidelijk zijn.


2.4.7 Focus Visible (Level AA)

Any keyboard operable user interface has a mode of operation where the keyboard focus indicator is visible.

Information about success criterion 2.4.7 Focus Visible

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.5 Input Modalities

2.5.1 Pointer Gestures (Level A)

All functionality that uses multipoint or path-based gestures for operation can be operated with a single pointer without a path-based gesture, unless a multipoint or path-based gesture is essential.

Information about success criterion 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation (Level A)

For functionality that can be operated using a single pointer, at least one of the following is true:

Information about success criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


2.5.3 Label in Name (Level A)

For user interface components with labels that include text or images of text, the name contains the text that is presented visually.

Information about success criterion 2.5.3 Label in Name

Outcome: Passed


2.5.4 Motion Actuation (Level A)

Functionality that can be operated by device motion or user motion can also be operated by user interface components and responding to the motion can be disabled to prevent accidental actuation, except when:

Information about success criterion 2.5.4 Motion Actuation

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


3. Understandable

3.1 Readable

3.1.1 Language of Page (Level A)

The default human language of each Web page can be programmatically determined.

Information about success criterion 3.1.1 Language of Page

Outcome: Passed


3.1.2 Language of Parts (Level AA)

The human language of each passage or phrase in the content can be programmatically determined except for proper names, technical terms, words of indeterminate language, and words or phrases that have become part of the vernacular of the immediately surrounding text.

Information about success criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts

Outcome: Passed


3.2 Predictable

3.2.1 On Focus (Level A)

When any component receives focus, it does not initiate a change of context.

Information about success criterion 3.2.1 On Focus

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


3.2.2 On Input (Level A)

Changing the setting of any user interface component does not automatically cause a change of context unless the user has been advised of the behavior before using the component.

Information about success criterion 3.2.2 On Input

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


3.2.3 Consistent Navigation (Level AA)

Navigational mechanisms that are repeated on multiple Web pages within a set of Web pages occur in the same relative order each time they are repeated, unless a change is initiated by the user.

Information about success criterion 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


3.2.4 Consistent Identification (Level AA)

Components that have the same functionality within a set of Web pages are identified consistently.

Information about success criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Identification

Outcome: Passed


3.3 Input Assistance

3.3.1 Error Identification (Level A)

If an input error is automatically detected, the item that is in error is identified and the error is described to the user in text.

Information about success criterion 3.3.1 Error Identification

Outcome: Failed

Findings: Visitors can submit a form, for example on the page www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/stage. When visitors submit the form but have left some fields empty, an error message will appear, for example: 'Enter your mobile number here.'. An error message should state which error the visitor has made and where the error was made, for example 'The mobile number field has not been filled in.' That a visitor has to enter the mobile number is an error suggestion, not an error identification. This problem occurs on multiple pages.


3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (Level A)

Labels or instructions are provided when content requires user input.

Information about success criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions

Outcome: Failed

Findings: The 'Vul je e-mailadres in' form fields on the https://www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/ and https://www.werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/vacatures pages do not have a visible label, but do have a placeholder text. The placeholder text is not enough, because it disappears as soon as the visitor starts typing. It can be difficult for some people to remember what to fill in if it is not clearly stated. Add a label that will always be visible to resolve this issue.


3.3.3 Error Suggestion (Level AA)

If an input error is automatically detected and suggestions for correction are known, then the suggestions are provided to the user, unless it would jeopardize the security or purpose of the content.

Information about success criterion 3.3.3 Error Suggestion

Outcome: Passed


For Web pages that cause legal commitments or financial transactions for the user to occur, that modify or delete user-controllable data in data storage systems, or that submit user test responses, at least one of the following is true:

  1. Reversible: Submissions are reversible.
  2. Checked: Data entered by the user is checked for input errors and the user is provided an opportunity to correct them.
  3. Confirmed: A mechanism is available for reviewing, confirming, and correcting information before finalizing the submission.

Information about success criterion 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


4. Robust

4.1 Compatible

4.1.1 Parsing (Level A)

In content implemented using markup languages, elements have complete start and end tags, elements are nested according to their specifications, elements do not contain duplicate attributes, and any IDs are unique, except where the specifications allow these features.

Information about success criterion 4.1.1 Parsing

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.


4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (Level A)

For all user interface components (including but not limited to: form elements, links and components generated by scripts), the name and role can be programmatically determined; states, properties, and values that can be set by the user can be programmatically set; and notification of changes to these items is available to user agents, including assistive technologies.

Information about success criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

Outcome: Failed

Findings: At various places on the website, for example on the homepage or on a vacature-page you find next to the 'vacature' a number of icons, for example a Euro sign or a clock. Thes SVG-images have meaning but they lack an name.Solve this with role=image and a title describing the image. Also see 1.1.1


4.1.3 Status Messages (Level AA)

In content implemented using markup languages, status messages can be programmatically determined through role or properties such that they can be presented to the user by assistive technologies without receiving focus.

Information about success criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages

Outcome: Inapplicable

Findings: This research focuses on the content of the website, so this success criterion has not been investigated.

Basis for this evaluation

The audit was conducted based on the evaluation method of the W3C, WCAG-EM. This is largely done manually by taking a sample. For a quickscan we use parts of this methodology. Despite all the researcher's care and experience, it is possible that a problem has not been identified. Keep in mind that in a next audit certain parts could be assessed differently because of further development of techniques and assistive software. Tools are used in the manual audit.

Sample of audited web pages

Relied upon techniques

Web browsers (User Agents) and other software

The following software was used in this evaluation:

Resources:

This report is mainly created with the online W3C report tool.

Source: toegankelijkheidsrapport.swink.nl/werkenbijcapelleaandenijssel.nl/audit/
Printed: 2024-12-21 15:45:24 v2.5-011